|
 |

Family and Household Demographics
|
 |
 |
 | Estimated Number of Printed Pages: 10
|
 |
 |
 |
 | TOPICS COVERED: This memo deals with: current U.S. and international demographics on households and families; portraits of how many of those families are nuclear, married-couple or single-parent; how many people live on their own; and the size of households (which may, or may not, consist of a family). And that makes this memo – and its related twin, Is the Family in Decline? (Demographics) – probably the most dangerous of the Factbook memos. We're sure you'll find the information fascinating, and often surprising. But we caution you – make sure you know when you're comparing apples to apples instead of oranges. And even if the facts appear to be all "apples" – you may be comparing data as different as a Macintosh and a Granny Smith.
Because how countries define "family" varies considerably from nation to nation. (Check out our memo on Definitions of Family to get an idea of just how different those definitions can be. Throughout the Factbook, we've generally followed U.S. Census Bureau definitions – at least when we're talking about American demographics.) In the U.S., a "household" is everyone who lives in a dwelling, be it an apartment, house, whatever. Everyone who lives together is a "household," but they are not always a family. For example, two roommates who found each other on craigslist aren't counted as a family. In the U.S., to be a "family" involves, generally speaking, blood relations, marriage, a legal tie like adoption, etc., while a "family household" would require that the family actually lives together. If Grandma lives down the block, she's not considered in the family household, and sometimes wouldn't even be considered in the "family," when, of course, she is. The famed "nuclear family" is usually understood to be a family unit of both parents and their children – but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are married. An "extended family" includes family members other than parents and kids – could be a grandparent, cousin, or uncle. And an extended family might be a nuclear family, but it doesn't have to be: a grandparent could live with a mother and child, while the father is absent (and that's a common arrangement in many nations and cultures.). Tricky, isn't it?
For information about how these demographics has been changing over time, go to our memo on Is the Family in Decline? (Demographics). For information specifically relating to extended families, try our memo on Multiple Generation / Extended Family Households. And please note that this memo just barely scratches the surface on single-parent families, married and unmarried couples, etc.: if that is where your interest is, please check out those memos for much more information.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Number of U.S. “Family Households,” in 2003. 1. 68 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | in 2003 of all U.S. households are “family households” (at least two members related by birth, marriage or adoption). 2. 68 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. blacks live in family households – the same as that of the U.S. population as a whole. That's 9.1 million black families – and nearly half, 47 percent, of these are married-couple families. 3. 79 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Pacific Islander households in the U.S. are family households – higher than the national average (68 percent). 4. 7.4 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Number of families with dependent children in the U.K. in 2004. 5. 14.8 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Number of Australians (82 percent) who lived with at least one other family member in 2001, making up 4.9 million families in total. 6. 32 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. households have children. 7. 60 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Australian families – 2.5 million – in 2003 had children in them. 8. 1.3 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | new households in the U.S. have been formed each year since 2000. 9. 7.6 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Total number of Australian households. 10. 71 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Jewish Israeli households are couples with children. 12. 84 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Australian families in 2003 were couple families – 4.6 million. 13. 71 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Australian families with at least one child age 0-17 years in 2003 – 1.8 million – are intact couple families. 14. One-half
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of families in South Africa are "nuclear families." 15. 86 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of families in the United Kingdom are "nuclear families." 16. 66 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of the 13.1 million children in the United Kingdom live in a married-couple family. 17.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | In South America, nuclear households are "the most widespread form of residence." 18. But just 11.7 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of urban households in Argentina are "nuclear families" – mom, dad, and kids. 19. 31.8 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of urban households in Venezuela are "nuclear families." 20. 57 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Number of married-couple households residing in the United States in 2003 – 76 percent of family households. 21. 23 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. households are married couples with children. 22. 53 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. households in 2000 were married-couple households. 23. 32 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. black family households were married-couple households. 24. 56 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Pacific Islanders households are married couple households. 25. 55.1 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of Hispanics in the U.S. in 2000 married-couple households. 26. 12.9 million
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Number of U.S. female-maintained family households with no husband present: that’s 12.2 percent of all households. 27. There are more than three times as many
|
 |
 |
 |
 | married-couple households with children than there are female-headed family households with no husband but with children present. That’s 7.2 percent of all households. That is compared to 6.0 million (6.6 percent) in 1990. There are, nationally, more than three times as many married-couple households with children than there are female family households. 28. At least twice as many
|
 |
 |
 |
 | In every one of states in the U.S., there are at least twice the number of married-couple households with children as there are female-only headed family households. 29. In Washington, DC
|
 |
 |
 |
 | however, there are more female-headed only family households (25,000) than it does married couple couple households with children (21,000). 30. 30 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | U.S. black family households headed with a woman, and no husband present – triple the national rate of 12 percent. 31. Less than six percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. blacks live in family households headed with by a man, with no wife present. – the same as that of the U.S. population as a whole. 32. 17 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of households in Peru, Guatemela, Mexico are headed by women. 33. 25 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of households in Chile during the 1990s were headed by women. 34.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | South African children are more likely to be raised in a family without a father, but with other relatives living in the house, than are children in Western countries. 35. 13 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of black families in South Africa are headed by the grandparent. But that's only the case for 0.5 percent of white South African families. 36. 22.2 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of the richest households in Uruguay are married-couple households without children. 37. 4.4 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | American households with just one person in 2000 – 26 percent of all households. 39. One out of every four –
|
 |
 |
 |
 | British households with just one person in 2004 – 29 percent of all households. That's 7.0 million – more than four times the number it was in 1961. 40.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | In South America, "There is a clear class difference in the prevalence of one or another form of household. Singleperson households are a chosen form for the upper strata and are almost non-existent among the poorest sectors of society." 41. 32.4 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of the richest households in Uruguay are single-person households. 42. 2.7 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | In 2000, more than half of the people in the U.S. lived in households of one, two, or three people. 44. 2.57
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Average number of people in an U.S. household in 2003. 45. 2.72
|
 |
 |
 |
 | average household size of U.S. blacks who live in family households. 46. 3.08
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Average number of people in an Asian household in the U.S., above the U.S. national average of 2.59. 47. 9.8 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of U.S. households in 2003 contained five people or more. 48. 74.2 percent
|
 |
 |
 |
 | of households in Pakistan have five or more members. 49. 4.9
|
 |
 |
 |
 | average family size in urban Egypt in the 1990s. 50. 6.5
|
 |
 |
 |
 | average family size in rural Egypt in the 1990s. 51. Eight
|
 |
 |
 |
 | According to a study, the average family size in Qatar. 52. 7.28
|
 |
 |
 |
 | average family size in the United Arab Emirates. 53. 3.1
|
 |
 |
 |
 | The average size of an Australian family household in 2003. 54. 7.4
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Average household size in Afghanistan in the 1990s. 55. 6.7
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Average household size in Pakistan in the 1990s. 56. 5.4
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Average household size in India in the 1990s. 57. 2.7
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Japan’s average household size in 2000. 58. 5.4
|
 |
 |
 |
 | India’s average household size in the 1990s, a decrease from 5.5, in the 1980s. 59. ____________________________________________________
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 3. See Jesse D. McKinnon and Claudette E. Bennett, We the People: Blacks in the United States, U.S. Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-25. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 5. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-25.pdf and ________, "African-American History Month: February 2006," Facts for Features, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (December 5, 2005). Archived at: 4http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006088.html
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 4. Philip M. Harris and Nicholas A. Jones, "We the People: Pacific Islanders in the United States," Census 2000 Special Report, CENSR-26. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 8. Archived at: http://www.census.gov./prod/2005pubs/censr-26.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 18. Note that this means that both parents are present; it does not indicate whether or not the couple is married. Elizabeth Jelin and Ana Rita Díaz-Muñoz, "Major Trends Affecting Families: South America in Perspective," Major Trends Affecting Families: A Background Document, Report for United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Social Policy and Development, Program on the Family (2003), p. 4. Archived at: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/Publications/mtjelin.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 19. Note that this means that both parents are present; it does not indicate whether or not the couple is married. Elizabeth Fussell and Alberto Palloni, "Persistent Marriage Regimes in Changing Times," Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, pp. 1201-1213 (December 2004), p. 1208.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 20. Note that this means that both parents are present; it does not indicate whether or not the couple is married.Elizabeth Fussell and Alberto Palloni, "Persistent Marriage Regimes in Changing Times," Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, pp. 1201-1213 (December 2004), p. 1208 (citation omitted).
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 24. As of 2000. Jesse D. McKinnon and Claudette E. Bennett, We the People: Blacks in the United States, U.S. Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-25. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 5. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-25.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 25. Philip M. Harris and Nicholas A. Jones, "We the People: Pacific Islanders in the United States," Census 2000 Special Report, CENSR-26. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 8. Archived at: http://www.census.gov./prod/2005pubs/censr-26.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 27. Tavia Simmons and Grace O'Neill, Households and Families: 2000, U.S. Census 2000 Brief, C2KBR/01-8. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (2001), p.2. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-8.pdf; and Reneé Spraggins, We the People: Women and Men in the United States, Census 2000 Special Report, CENSR-20. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (2005), p. 8. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-20.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 31. As of 2000. Jesse D. McKinnon and Claudette E. Bennett, We the People: Blacks in the United States, U.S. Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-25. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 5. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-25.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 32. As of 2000. Jesse D. McKinnon and Claudette E. Bennett, We the People: Blacks in the United States, U.S. Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-25. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (August 2005), p. 5. Archived at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/censr-25.pdf
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 33. Elizabeth Fussell and Alberto Palloni, "Persistent Marriage Regimes in Changing Times," Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, pp. 1201-1213 (December 2004), p. 1209.
|
 |
 |
 |
 | 34. Elizabeth Fussell and Alberto Palloni, "Persistent Marriage Regimes in Changing Times," Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, pp. 1201-1213 (December 2004), p. 1209 (citation omitted).
|
 |
 |
| |